Health

Take care of your health

Nature of life

It goes on.

Future

welcome to the future

Present

Future just ahed

Feel

Save Nature

Showing posts with label Dadri riot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dadri riot. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 October 2015

India yet to have free debate on communalism: Nirmala Sitharaman


Union Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Wednesday that the Dadri incident demonstrated that the “country does not have a free and fair debate on communal ism.” Ms. Sitharaman also said the protest by writers in returning awards conferred on them by the Sahitya Akademi, raises “more questions than it answers.”
Speaking to The Hindu, she said: “I’ve always found that in issues to do with communal ism, a lot of things get churned up and by the time a reasonable dialogue takes place, enough is said about the BJP, its ideology, the RSS without ever giving the BJP its voice.
“It is invariably assigned a defensive position, by the time it enters the fray. It is a shame that the country does not prefer to have a free and open debate on communal ism and communal incidents.”
To blame the Center in a State issue is to deny its seriousness, she charged.
BJP’s views not heard, says Minister
Union Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman claimed on Wednesday that in communal issues the BJP’s side of the story was hardly heard and the Center was blamed when it was hardly in the picture.
“Where the Center is to be blamed, please do so. But where it is a State issue, to expect the Prime Minister to answer… and to push him to say things and to bemoan that ‘this country is going to the dogs, etc.’ is to deny the seriousness of the issue.”
Asked about Culture Minister Mahesh Sharma’s incendiary comments while visiting the village in Dadri where Mohammad Akhlaq had been lynched on suspicion of keeping beef in his house, Ms. Sitharaman said she could not presume on her Cabinet colleague’s right to represent a case from an area where he was an MP. “The larger picture is that such debates cannot be appropriated by some people, who are well within their rights to air their opinion, but deny any attempts at a counter-argument.
“I always find the counter-argument is pushed to the BJP, with all these narratives arraigned against you, already in place, in an arena stacked with opponents, and our party is expected to step in and ‘fill in the blanks.’ For example, a professor in Kerala had his hand chopped off for setting a question paper for his students which was not to the liking of a certain community. How many debates of the kind we are seeing now happened then? Why are these debates always wrenched out and appropriated by just some people?”
She questioned the wide spectrum of writers who had returned awards conferred on them by the Sahitya Akademi.
“The first thing to note in this is that they are protesting, aren’t they? They are speaking out, aren’t they? Is there an attempt to muffle their voice?
“Mr. Kalburgi had been killed in Karnataka, where a Congress government is in place, Dadri is in Uttar Pradesh where the Samajwadi Party rules. If all over the country, as they put it, it is the responsibility of the Center for having created an environment that they feel like protesting against, are they denying the State government’s role in taking care of law and order? The writers have every right to protest, their protest is a message, which we have received, but have they properly contextualised their protest?.

Friday, 9 October 2015

T.M. Krishna's open letter to Prime Minister

Carnatic vocalist T.M. Krishna


Honourable Narendra Modi-ji

As I penned this piece, I heard of your words at a rally in Bihar, and instead of deterring me from writing to you, it only strengthened my resolve that this needs to be said.
Over the last week or more we have witnessed what can only be described as the molestation of a human tragedy, the perpetrators of this crime being politicians colored green, saffron and various other shades, all no less sullied. As individuals, party-men, members of the ruling class and the opposition benches, they have vulgarized the very soul of compassion and empathy. This is for certain not a new phenomenon, and only another sign of who we are.
However, with all due respect Pradhan Mantri-ji, what has astonished me is not just your silence, but the spoken and written words with which we citizens have been abused, ridiculed and trivialized for asking the elected leader of this country to respond. This is not a request from a political outfit, but from the people — just normal people belonging to the various parts, the sum of which is India. Is this really such an unfair request? Don't we have the right to ask, if not demand that you speak your mind? Why are we being made to feel like offenders because we want you to say something direct and substantial on something that is for certain of socio-cultural importance? With all due respect, I have the right to not vote for you, yet to want from you, as Prime Minister, a response.
You know what has been agitating the minds of millions of us, Indians — the future of our pluralism. You have stated your position in terms of 'sabka sath, sabka vikas'. And this is quoted and cited on your behalf repeatedly as a mantra. But, Pradhan Mantriji, this is certainly not adequate. We need to hear you, our Prime Minister, directly and clearly and with an urgent reference to the present situation, which is nothing less than a tragedy. Over the last few months we have had more than one tragedy. Can we really not see the connections between the so-called stray incidences all over the country, from the murders of Dabholkar, Pansare and Kalburgi to that of Mohammad Akhlaq. Your direct voice needs to be heard now, unless you do not consider this an event of significance. And now, the ambiguity of what you said yesterday only makes me send you this appeal for your truthful intervention. This is not the time for platitudes, Pradhan Mantriji, but for a ringing condemnation from you, a kind of condemnation which will leave no one in doubt that the Indian State is not going to tolerate anyone being killed for his views, his faith, his food.
Was the Dadri tragedy not the result of the overt and aggressive imposition of a beef ban by certain State governments with leaders from numerous parties further exploiting the situation? Sir, are you not disturbed – infuriated would be more appropriate — by the cost we are paying, and will continue to pay, for this mindlessness ? Hearing Hindu hardliners bring about counter-examples of Hindus being targets of violent crimes, is tiresome. The fact that those are as condemn able and must be stopped cannot be used to make Dadri a small or stray incident. And to accuse the media of over-playing this is downright despicable.
Today many in this country and elsewhere see you as an American presidential-style PM and you too seem to wear that notion with great style. That being so, you must respond like the American President does whenever there is any violence that is connected to race, ethnicity, religion or directly as a result of American laws and policy, irrespective of where it took place, who were the targets or the number of people affected. The citizens may not agree with him, but at least they hear his thoughts. From you we hear only generalities. The President of India is a symbol and his words guide us in spirit. You Sir, the Prime minister, is the ‘reality’ dealing with actual action, reaction, reconciliation, betterment and strength.
You have said so many times that your government is one of difference and a conscious effort of your government has been to erase everything that you see as the evils of the Congress past. Then unlike them, speak, appeal, be forceful and clear those muddled minds. Please don't play to the electoral gallery. You seem to be doing exactly that.
And Mr. Prime Minister, unlike your immediate predecessor you are not a mute spectator; you love to address and impress. We have heard you from Lal Qila, Madison Square Garden, Dubai and Silicon Valley, at the home of Google and Facebook. We have seen you being moved by the memory of the hardships faced by your mother. Words, strong and emotional words come to you easily. So why do we need to shout and scream for a few sentences about a man who was lynched for allegedly consuming beef?
Even after the lynching, your senior Minister and members of your party are on record making the most inhuman statements. Today the Culture Minister says you spoke to him. But Modi-ji this is not a private matter between the two of you! This is a matter of and for Indians and we need to hear you condemn your Minister. You are fearless and free with your assault on opposition parties; can we please witness the same eloquence when it comes to your Ministers and party members?
The RSS and affiliates of the Sangh Parivar are constantly alienating people. Modi-ji you are both the Prime Minister and the colossus that controls the BJP, therefore you are responsible for both establishments. Not only them, but also for the vulgarities spouted by members of the Sangh Parivar. You are a self-proclaimed proud Svayamsevak and it is clear that the Parivar is indeed a family. Therefore you cannot choose when to celebrate your Sangh identity and when to distance yourself from it. This is double speak.
Your party spokesmen in their own inimitable style have been saying that it is your right to decide whether to speak, where to do so and in what form. They are absolutely correct, but if you don’t feel you need to say something that will shut all these extreme actions that drain the happiness out of people, even a non-believer will seek divine intervention.
This is not about secularism; this is about us being a humane, real and sensitive, a non-accusatory nation. You use social media widely, something you happily flaunted in the presence of Mark Zuckerberg and hence I am certain you have seen all the vitriolic comments that are swarming Indian cyberspace. Don’t you think you need to confront it directly?
Finally Sir, you have said that Hindus and Muslims must decide what they want to fight, each other or poverty. To me this is nothing but another empty slogan because poverty is inextricably connected to religion, caste and class. Unless we face up to these challenges with greater honesty and courage, not just our poverty but our backwardness will remain indeed incurable.

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Dadri Police want BJP leaders booked

BJP MLA Sangeet Som interacting with the media after his visit to Bishara village. Photo: Prashant Nakwe

The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) on Tuesday sought a report from the Union Home Ministry on the Dadri incident in which a 50-year-old man was dragged out of his house and lynched amid rumors that he had consumed beef.
Union Home Secretary Rajiv Mehrishi is said to have given a detailed report to the PMO based on the reply given by the Uttar Pradesh government on Tuesday. The State government’s report, as first reported by The Hindu, did not mention the word beef and said the deceased Akhlaq was lynched over allegations that he had consumed pratibandhit pashu ka maans (meat of animal whose slaughter is banned).
On Tuesday, the Home Ministry shot off another letter to the Uttar Pradesh government, asking for a compliance report on the advisory sent by it on Monday. The MHA asked all the States to take the strictest action against those who attempted to weaken the secular fabric by exploiting religious emotions.
In a statement, the MHA said it was concerned at various incidents with communal overtones across the country, including the “unfortunate” incident at Dadri.
“We are examining the report sent by the Uttar Pradesh government regarding the incident and have also sent a strongly-worded letter seeking a compliance report on the steps taken by it to bring in communal harmony in the region,” said a senior official of the Home Ministry. Of the 10 accused named in the FIR, eight have been arrested.
On the sidelines of a function in Delhi, Home Minister Rajnath Singh said: “It was an unfortunate incident. I appeal to every citizen to maintain communal harmony, which is everyone’s responsibility.”
The Dadri police also advised the police headquarters in Lucknow to take legal action against Union Minister for Culture and local MP Mahesh Sharma and BJP MLA and Muzaffarnagar riots accused Sangeet Som for violating prohibitory orders in Bishahra village. Another political leader against whom the local police have recommended action is Bahujan Samaj Party general secretary Naseemuddin Siddiqui.
The village and nearby areas became tense after Akhlaq’s lynching. The matter became communal as the trigger was beef, the victim was a Muslim and all the accused were Hindus.
As the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) on Tuesday sought a report from the Union Home Ministry on the Dadri incident and the Ministry shot off another letter to the Uttar Pradesh government, asking for a compliance report on the advisory sent by it on Monday, Superintendent of Police (Dadri Rural) Sanjay Singh told The Hindu that the headquarters in Lucknow had asked the local police to send a report on the visit to the village by several political leaders.
Legal action
“We have the names of the three leaders in our report and have also advised legal action against them for violating Section 144 which was in force in the village…” Mr. Singh said. “Legal action could be taken against Mahesh Sharma, Som and Siddique.”
Both Union Minister for Culture and local MP Mahesh Sharma and BJP MLA and Muzaffarnagar riots accused Sangeet Som had gone to the village temple which was misused to spread the rumor about beef at Mohammad Akhlaq’s house. Mr. Som visited the village on Sunday in a communally charged atmosphere and invoked the Muzaffarnagar riots while talking to a crowd. Without mentioning the riots, he said that if the law acts in favor of a particular community, “we are capable of giving a fitting reply as we did in the past.”
Sources said the police had in their possession a video recording of the speech made by Mr. Som, portions of which were found inflammatory.
In its report, the administration also said that at a time when the village needed to be calmed, Mr. Som made statements which could pose a challenge to law and order.
The police are also trying to find out the volunteers who spread the word about Mr. Som’s arrival and invited people for his speech.
Visiting the village last Friday, Mr. Sharma held a meeting in the compound of the temple and warned the media against “doing politics.”
The village was polarised on communal lines in the aftermath of the lynching. Members of the dominant Hindu community alleged harassment by the police. They have been protesting, and chased out reporters for “one-sided coverage.”